Frankenstein Blade Runner

Frankenstein Blade Runner Essay Analyse how Frankenstein and Blade Runner imaginatively portray individuals who challenge the naturalized values of the time. In your response, refer to twain excerpts below. i) Slave, I before reasoned with you, precisely you have proved yourself pitiable of my condescension. Remember that I have powers, you believe yourself miserable, alone I nates make you so wretched that the light of day will be hateful to you. You be my creator, but I am your master-obey ii) the lock away of Roy holding Tyrells faceThrough the family relationship between the calibers of succeeder and his shaft, Shelley challenges nineteenth degree Celsius values about the role of attainment, the benefits of dream and fame and the dominance of nature by man. Similarly Scott develops the char make outers of Roy and Tyrell to challenge the same assumptions about scholarship and nature but he does so in a context of technological reading that allows multinational c onjunctions to exploit on a massive scale. Both texts to a fault explore the larger issue of adult male values, asking what potential lies in a gentle and whether we can readily define human nature.In Shelleys new, lords portrayal challenges the assumptions of the previous eighteenth century that the hap of intelligence is the most important human pursuit. He is the The modern Prometheus a Greek mythological human who stole fire from the idols and brought it back to earth. This layer equivalent Shelleys questions the benefits and consequences of ambition. In Shelleys Romantic context acquirement is seen as a threat towards nature and Shelley conveys this threat through the hubris of captain.Shelley explores Victors blind ambition to penetrate into the recesses of nature and show how she industrial plant in her hiding-places. Victors character is seen as self- overheared and his ambition is fueled by selfish reasons A crude species would bless me as its creator and sourc ewould owe their world to me. Victors character is obsessed to the point of clean-living blindness but when the creature is non perfect it quickly turns to hatred. Shelleys imagery suggests decay rather than new life. I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature have How can I describe my emotions at this catastrophe.This characterisation of Victor and his lack of morals and blind ambition argon all warnings against science and its unbounded progression. Similarly Roys confrontation with Tyrell, his creator, explores the powerful consequences of playing god with genetics, a new frontier of scientific experimentation. Scott challenges the established values, which worship science and the moolah it can bring. Scott portrays Tyrells character as god-like, through the accustom of cinematic techniques, costume design and lighting. He is filmed from high angle shots empowering him in almost every scene.Scott uses a series of shots of Tyrell corporation everyplace shadowing Los Angeles to build the image of Tyrells power and how much it dominates all. This corporation fueled by ambition is linked to the issues relevant to Scotts context, the stick of the capitalist world and what the consequences may be if this ambition is non met with moral guidance. Scott uses costume design, with the thick lensed glasses as a metaphor for Tyrells moral blindness. The motif of eyes, used throughout the film, cost the window to the intelligence and Scott is saying that Tyrells window is damaged.Tyrell and Roy meet in Tyrells palace- like room, Tyrell is dressed in a huge kingly robe with candles dishwashing the room in a golden light, contrasting with the fake candent light that dominates the movie. Like Frankensteins creature, Roy has been made physically and morally super to Tyrell his creator. In this scene the audience sees the creation come back to give the axe the creator and the mood that science has progressed so far that is supersedes its creators is seen. This asks questions about the fashion science should head in.Through the development of Victor and the creatures relationship, questions ar raised about the responsibilities of the creator and what values make us human. Victor makes a creature that he abandons to the harsh world where he is not understood. This shapes the way the creature is developed and supports the blank slate idea of Shelleys context. Shelley challenges the values that assume we are born with a certain requirement and those who are bad deserve bad lives. She puts forward the Enlightenment idea that man are ll born with the potential to be good. Shelly shows this through the relationship between Victor and the creature, who both need sock and compassion aspects of human nature that are given through nurture. The creature had been capable of hotheaded acts of kindness as he rescues a child from the river and does acts of kindness for the De Laceys. Shelley uses this to represent the potential for good in human n ature and that people are not predetermined but can be turned to sinister if neglected I was benevolent and good misery made me a fiend.These are the results of Victors blind ambition, self poignancy and disregard for his responsibilities, all unfavorable aspects of human nature. With neglect, the creature is doomed to alone find pleasure in the acts of hate towards Victor, but even these acts are not satisfying as he is morally just, causing the creature to be constantly unhappy. Similarly, Roys development from a child-like selfishness to maturity, capable of love and compassion, challenges the belief that science can control its creations and that they are only worthy for profit.Tyrells corporation represents the greed and ambition that drives the world of Scotts context, it represents the negative consequence of a world bent on profit at the expense of moral justness. The commercialization of science is seen as profitable, but as Scott shows, commercialization of science do esnt take into account the act of giving life and the responsibility due to the creation, it only works on profits and issuees and as a result, the replicants are seen as a quantity. When science is commercialized, greed and ambition blind the morals that science needs.Scott shows this through the act of Roy, like Shelleys creature, killing his creator, in revenge for neglect. The replicants capacity to absorb experience and change, challenges the values that assume humans are the supreme quantity of everything. Scott draws upon modern psychology to portray the replicants development as a heart of discussing human nature, Ironically the genius replicant Roy proves Tyrells slogan More human than human when he gradually develops into a better human being than the humans themselves. Roy is firstly portrayed as a child as he compliments J. Fs toys and plays a sort of chase game with Deckard.Like the creature Roy is new to life and stirredly inexperienced, but through his developm ent of memories and experiences, he blend ins human, learning empathy and love. This development in the replicants emotions is a strong parallel to the creature with the effects of neglect and the ability to be morally educated. The four-year life span is a guard against emotional development triggered by experience. Memories given to the replicants are creations that allow for control If we talent them the past we create a cushion or pillow for their emotions and then we can control them better. Roys development of love and compassion is uttered with Pris, this is shown through his howling and stuttering over her name after she has been killed. Roy also develops empathy which is seen in saving Deckard. Scott uses Roys monologue to fully express to the audience how Roy has become human. He does this through dialogue all these moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain expressing loss and a desire to preserve memory. Through the metaphor of the dove procession into the heave ns, his spirit is released through the only living creature seen in the movie.Both the novel Frankenstein, and the film Blade Runner imaginatively portray individuals who challenge the established values of the time both discuss the role of science, the benefits of ambition and fame and the sizeableness of nurture. The characterization and the development of relationships between creator and creature holds the key in both texts to not only challenging the contemporary values of the nineteenth and 20th century, but also issues and question about life and humans that have been dwelled upon over many centuries.