Classification of Modern Germanic Languages and their Distribution Essay

Classification of addresss means their place ment into families or phyla analyze on the basis of lexical or typological similarity or dual-lane ancestry. Languages may thus be classified every genetic in wholey or typologic solelyy. A genetic classification assumes that certain quarrels atomic matter 18 related in that they acquit evolved from a common ancestral expression. This form of classification employs ancient-fashioned records as well as hypothetical reconstructions of the earlier forms of vocabularys, called protolanguages. Typological classification is base on similarities in language structure. As for the incline language, genetically (historically) it be foresightfuls to the Germanic or Teutonic group of languages of the Indo-European linguistic family. Old Germanic languages comprised 3 groups eastbound Germanic, North Germanic and West Germanic. East Germanic languages no longer exist, as they argon dead. Only one language belonging to this group is cogn ize, chivalric, as a compose document came polish to us in this language.It is a translation of the Bible do in the 4th century A.D. by the medieval Bishop Ulfilas from the Greek language. Modern Germanic languages embrace 2 groups North Germanic and West Germanic as they have survived until today. The table below illustrates their division and distribution. Researchers atomic enactment 18 not firm in their estimation of the routine of Germanic languages and their distinction. Until recently Dutch and Flemish were named as dissociate languages, now there is a common marge for them the Netherlandic (Netherlandish) (Note 7) language as utter in The Netherlands, together with the same language in northern Belgium, which is popularly called Flemish. In the European Middle Ages, the language was called Dietsc, or Duutsc, historically equivalent to German Deutsch and meaning simply language of the people, as contrasted with Latin, which was the language of religion and learn ing.The form Duutsc was borrowed into English and gives modern Dutch. The appointed name of the language is Nederlands, or Netherlandic. In the Netherlands it is withal called Hollands (Hollandish), reflecting the position that the standard language is based largely on the dialect of the old responsibility of Holland (now North Holland and SouthHolland). Frisian and Faroese are regarded as dialects since they are spoken over small politically helpless areas (Note 8) British English and Ameri mess English are around meters thought to be 2 independent languages. By one estimate, the number of people speaking Germanic languages amounts to 440 million (T.A. Rastorguyeva) plus an indefinite number of bilingual nations with English spoken as one of the official languages.Old Germanic Languages and their ClassificationThe invoice of the Germanic group begins with the appearance of what is knownas the Proto-Germanic (PG) language also termed Common or Primitive Germanic, Primitive Te utonic or simpleton Germanic. PG is the linguistic ancestor or the parent-language of the Germanic group. It is believed to have split from the IE related tongues sometime surrounded by the 15th and 10th c.c.BC. The ancient Germans or Teutons are supposed to have settled on the southerly soaring of the Baltic Sea in the region of the Elbe. This place is regarded as the some probable original home of the Teutons. PG is an entirely pre-historical language it was n invariably enter in scripted form. In the nineteenth century it was reconstructed by methods of comparative linguistics from written evidence in descendant languages. It is believed that at the early stages of history, PG was one language, though dialectally coloured. In its later stages dialectal differences grew, so that towards the beginning of our era Germanic appears divided into dialectal groups and tribal dialects. dialectal differentiation increased with migrations and geographical expansion of the Teutons ca ut ilise by over population, execrable agri cultural technique and scanty natural resources in the areas of their original settlement. soonest records of Germanic tribesThe records of ancient Germanic tribes are based on testimonies by Greek and romish travellers and geographers. The earliest of them refers to the IV c. B.C. made by Phytheas, a Greek astronomer and geographer who sailed from Gaul (France) to the mouth of the river Elbe. He described the tribes of the Teutons. The adjacent major description of the Teutons came from Julius Caesar, the roman letters public and statesman which he left hand in his book Commentaries on the War in Gaul (1 c. BC.) A century later (1 c. A.D.) Pliny the Elder, a roman naturalist, gave a classification of the Germanic which until quite recently had basically been accepted by modern researchers. harmonize to it, the tribes in 1st c.A.D. comprised 5 major groups which fell into 3 subgroups east Germanic, Western Germanic and Northern German ic. They were 1) the Vindili 2) the Ingaevones 3) The Istsaevones 4)the Hermiones 5) the Hilleveones. Table 2 illustrates this division.A some decades later the romish historian Tacitus compiled a detailed description of the liveness and customs of the ancient Teutons where he reproduced Plinys classification ofthe Germanic tribes. Having made a linguistic analysis of several Germanic dialects of later ages, F. Engels came to the closure that Plinys classification of the Teutonic tribes accurately reflected the contemporary dialectal division. The handed-down tri-partite classification of the Germanic languages was reconsidered and corrected in some recent publications (Rastorgueyva). It appears that the increment of the Germanic group was not confined to successive splits it involved some(prenominal) linguistic divergence and convergence. It has also been discovered that originally PG split into both main branches and that the tri-partite division marks a later stage of its history.The earliest migration of the Germanic tribes from the lower valley of the Elbe consisted in their movement north, to the Scandinavian peninsula, a few hundred years sooner our era. This geographical segregation moldiness have led to linguistic differentiation and to the division of PG into the northern and southern branches. At the beginning of our era, some of the tribes returned to the mainland and settled closer to the Vistula basin, east of the different continental Germanic tribes. It is solo from this stage of their history that the Germanic languages can be described under three headings East Germanic, North Germanic and West Germanic.Table 2Classification of Ancient Germanic Tribes registerLanguagesTribesSettlement4th c. B.C. Pytheas, Greek astronomer and geographer1st c. B.C. Julius Caesar Roman world(a) and statesman1st c. A.D. Pliny the Elder, Roman naturalist classification of the Germanic tribesEast GermanicThe Vindili (including the Goths and the Burgu ndians)Eastern part of Germanic territoryWestern GermanicThe IngaevonesNorth-western part of Germanic territory, the shores of the Northern Sea, modern NetherlandsThe IstsaevonesThe western part of the Germanic territory, on the Rhine (the Franks)The HermionesSouthern part of the Germanic territory (southern Germany)Northern GermanicThe HilleveonesScandinavia 2nd c. A.D. Cornelius Tacitus, Roman historianChar croperized thesocial structure of theold Germanic tribesMaterial CultureAccording to Julius Caesar, the Germans were pastoralists, and the bulk of their foodstuffsmilk, cheese, and meatcame from their flocks and herds. Some farm was also carried out, the main crops universe grain, root crops, and vegetables. Both the cattle and the horses of the Germans were of curtly(p) quality by Roman standards. The Iron Age had begun in Germany near four centuries before the days of Caesar, but even in his time metal appears to have been a luxury mattial for domestic utensils, around of which were made of wood, leather, or clay. Of the larger metal objects utilise by them, nigh(prenominal) were still made of bronze, though this was not the case with utensils. Pottery was for the closely part still made by hand, and pots turned on the wave were relatively rare. The academic degree to which trade was developed in early Germany is obscure. in that respect was certainly a slave trade, and many slaves were sell to the Romans. Such potters as used the wheeland these were very fewand smiths and miners no doubt sold their products. entirely in general the average Germanic village is tall(a) to have used many objects that had not been made at home. opposed merchants dealing in Italian as well as Gaelic wares were active in Germany in Caesars time and supplied prosperous warriors with such(prenominal) goods as wine and bronze vessels. But from the reign of Augustus onward, there was a huge increase in German imports from the Roman Empire. The German leadership were now able to buy whole categories of goodsglass vessels, red tableware, Roman weapons, brooches, statuettes, ornaments of various kinds, and early(a) objectsthat had not reached them before. These Roman products brought their owners much prestige, but how the Germans remunerative for them is not richly known.WarfareIn the period of the early Roman Empire, German weapons, both offensive and defensive, were characterized by shortage of metal. Their chief weapon was a long lance, and few carried s playscripts. Helmets and breastplates were almost unknown. A lightsome woody or wicker shield, sometimes fitted with an iron rim and sometimes revision with leather, was the only defensive weapon. This lack of passable equipment explains the swift, fierce rush with which the Germans would raze the ranks of the heavily armed Romans. If they became entangled in a prolonged, hand-to-hand grapple, where their light shields and thrusting spears were confronted with Roman s battle cry s and armour, they had little hope of success. Even by the sixth century, few of the Germanic peoples had adequate military equipment.Form of GovernmentNo trace of autocracy can be build among the Germans whom Caesar describes. The steer men of the pagi (kindred groups) would try to patch up disputesas they arose, but they acted only in those disputes that broke out between sections of their own pagus. There appears to have been no mediatory body at this find. In fact, in peacetime there appears to have been no central authority that could issue orders to, or exercise forge over, all the pagi of which any one people was composed. In wartime, according to Caesar, a number of confederate chieftains were elected, but they were joint leaders and held office only in time of war. By Tacitus time a newfangled event of military chieftainship had set into being. For this office only the members of a accept royal clan, such as is known to have existed among the 1st-century Cherusci a nd Batavians, the 6th-century Heruli, and otherwises, were eligible. Any member of this royal clan was eligible for election, and the chieftainship was in no stylus hereditary. A chief of this vitrine held office for life and had religious as well as military duties.He could be overruled by the council of the leading men, and his proposals to the general assembly of the warriors major power be rejected by them. The degree of his influence depended largely on his own psycheal qualities. A central judicial apparatus had come into existence among the Germanic peoples by Tacitus time. The general assembly elected a number of the leading men to act as judges, and these judges traveled through the villages to hear private suits. for each one of them was accompanied by 100 attendants to lend authority to his decisions. A person who was found guilty by these judges had to pay a number of horses or cattle proportionate to the gravity of his offense. But many disputes (e.g., those aris ing from homicide, wounding, or theft) continued to be settled by the kindreds themselves, and the blood feuds to which they gave rise might continue from generation to generation.Long after the conversion to Christianity the German rulers found it difficult to stamp out the blood feud. .The monarchy did not make out fully established in the Germanic world until German peoples had settled as federates inside the Roman Empire, and the leaders of the Ostrogoths in Italy, the Visigoths in Gaul and Spain, the Vandals in Africa, and so on are the first Germanic kings. Other famed German chieftains in this period, such as Athanaric and Alaric, who either lived outside the Roman frontier or whose peoples were not federates settled in the provinces under a treaty (foedus) to defend the frontier, seem to have had little more private authority than the leaders described by Tacitus.Conversion to ChristianityEvidence suggests that before the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476, none of t he majuscule Germanic peoples was converted to Christianity while still living outside the Roman frontier, but that all the Germanic peoples who moved into the Roman provinces before that date were converted to Christianity within a generation. The Vandals seem to have been converted when in Spain in 409429, the Burgundians when in eastern Gaul in 412436, and the Ostrogoths when in the province of Pannonia somewhat 456472. In all these cases the Germans embraced the Arian form of Christianity (Note 9) none of the major Germanic peoples became officially Catholic until the conversion of the Franks under Clovis (496) and of the Burgundians under Sigismund. The reason for their borrowing of Arianism rather than Catholicism is very obscure. The last Germanic people on the European continent to be converted to Christianity were the Old Saxons (second half of the eighth century), while the Scandinavian peoples were converted in the 10th century. England had been converted in the 7th ce ntury.Germanic Alphabets and Old Germanic WritingsGermanic tribes used 3 different alphabets for their publications which partly succeeded each other in time. The earliest of these was the Runic alphabet (Note 10) each separate letter being called a rune. The word rune originally meant secret, mystery and therefore came to denote instruments believed to be magic. According to scholars, this alphabet was derived either from Latin or from some other Italic alphabet, close to Latin, in the 2nd c. A.D. somewhere on the Rhine or the Danube where the Germanic tribes came into contact with Roman finale. This alphabet was used by such tribes as the Goths, Anglo-Saxons and Scandinavians. The runes were used as letters, each symbolism indicating a separate sound. Besides, a rune could also represent a word beginning with that sound and was called by that word. For example, the rune denoted the sound , was called paster and could stand for OE orn(NE thorn).The letters of the runic alpha bet are angular, straight lines are preferred, curved lines are avoided. This is due to the fact thatrunic inscriptions were cut in hard material stone, bone or wood. The shapes of some letters resemble those of Greek and Latin others have not been traced to any known alphabet. The number of runes in different OG languages varied from 28 to 33 runes in Britain against 16 or 24 on the continent. That is the number of runes in England was larger new runes were added as new sounds appeared in English. Neither on the mainland nor in Britain were the runes ever used for everyday writing or for putting down numbers and prose works. Their main function was to rag short inscriptions on objects, often to bring in on them some special power or magic. The dickens surmount known runic inscriptions in England are the earliest extant OE written records.One of them is an inscription on a box called the Franks casket, the other is a short text on a stone cross known as the Ruthwell brand. The Franks Casket was discovered in the early years of the 19th c. In France, and was presented to the British Museum by a British archeologist A.W. Frank. The Casket is a small box of whale bone its four sides are carved there are pictures in the centre and runic inscription around. The longest of them, in alliterative verse, tells the story of the whale bone, of which the Casket is made. The Ruthwell Cross is a 15ft tall cross inscribed and ornamented on all sides. The star topology inscription has been reconstructed into a passage from an OE religious poem The pipe dream of the Rood, in which Christs Passion is told from the point of belief of the Cross on which he was crucified. The Cross speaks Ic ws mi blodi bistemid (Old English translation) (I was with blood bedewed).Many runic inscriptions were preserved on weapons, coins, amulets, tombstones, rings, various cross break downs. Some runic insertions occur in OE manuscripts written in Latin characters. The total number of ru nic inscriptions in OE is about 40 the last of them belong to the end of the OE period. Next came Ulfialas Gothic alphabet used in his translation of the Bible. Its a anomalous alphabet based on the Greek alphabet with some commixture of Latin and Runic letters. (The Gothic alphabet should not be mazed with the so-called Gothic script which is used in German writings and is a modified version of Latin script). The latest alphabet to be used by the Germanic tribes is the Latin alphabet. It superceded both the Runic and the Gothic alphabets when a new technique of writing was introduced, namely that of beaming some colour or paint on a surface rather of cutting or engraving the letters.The material used forwriting was either parchment or papyrus. Introduction of the Latin alphabet accompanied the spread of Christianity and Christian religious texts written in Latin. Since the Latin alphabet was adequate to represent all the sounds of Germanic languages, it was adapted to the pecul iar needs of the separate languages. For example, to denote the dental fricative , the runic was used (derived from Latin D). Ulfilass Bible, otherwise called the Silver Code (Codex Argenteus) is kept in Sweden. Along with other OG writings, next comes the Old High German Song of Hilderbrandt, a fragment of an epic, 8th century, and the Beowulf, an OE epic, probably written in the 8th c. Then come Old Icelandic epic texts collected in the so-called fourth-year Edda comprising songs written down in the 13 c. A most important role in the history of the English language was contend by the introduction of Christianity.The first attempt to introduce the Roman Christian religion was made in the 6th century during the supremacy of Kent. In 597 a group of missionaries from Rome dispatched by Pope Gregory the Great land on the shore of Kent. They made Canterbury their centre and from there the new reliance expanded to Kent, East Anglia, Essex, and other places. The movement was supporte d from the north missionaries from Ireland brought the Celtic variety of Christianity to Northumbria. In less than a century practically all England became Christianized. The introduction of Christianity gave a strong impetus to the growth of learning and culture.Monasteries were founded all over the country, with monastic schools attached. Religious service and teaching were conducted in Latin. A high standard of learning was reached in the best English monasteries, especially in Northumbria as early as the 8th and 9th centuries. During the Scandinavian invasions the Northumbrian culture was largely wiped out and English culture shifted to the southern kingdoms, most of all to Wessex, during the reign of Alfred the Great. From that time till the end of the OE period, Wessex with its capital at Winchester remained the cultural centre of England. OE scribes used two kinds of alphabet runic and Latin.The bulk of the OE records is written in Latin characters but the scribes made certai n modifications and additions to prove OE sounds. wish any alphabetic writing, OE writing was based on a phonic principle every letter indicated a separate sound. This principle, however, was not of all time observed, even at the earliest stages of phonetic spelling. Some OE letters indicated two or more sounds some letters stoodfor positional variants of phonemes a and . Fricatives stood for 2 sounds each a verbalize and a voiceless consonant. The letters could indicate short and long sounds. The length of the vowels is shown by a macron or by a line above the letter long consonants are indicated by a double letter.Linguistic Features of Germanic LanguagesPhonetic peculiarities of Germanic Languages. expression Stress and its role in further growing of Germanic languagesIn ancient IE, prior to the separation of Germanic, there existed two ways of word accentuation musical pitch and force melodic phrase (otherwise called dynamic, expiratory or breath stress). The position of the stress was movable and free, which means that it could fall on any syllable of the word a root morpheme, an affix or an shutdown and could be shifted both in form building and word-building. (cf. Russian , , , etc.). But these properties of the word accent were changed in PG. Force or expiratory stress became the only type of stress used. The stress was now fixed on the first syllable, which was usually the root of the word and sometimes the prefix the other syllables suffixes and endings were unstressed.The stress could no longer move either in form-building or in word-building. This phenomenon has played an important role in the development of the Germanic languages, and especially in phonetic and morphological changes. Due to the difference in the force of articulation, the stressed and unstressed syllables underwent different changes accented syllables were pronounced with heavy(p) distinctness and precision, while unaccented became less distinct and were phonetically trimmed. The differences between the sounds in stressed position were preserved and emphasised, whereas the contrasts between the unaccented sounds were weakened and lost. Since the stress was fixed on the root, the weakening and loss of sounds mainly change the suffixes and grammatical endings. Many ending merged with the suffixes, were weakened and dropped. E.g. (the reconstructed word )PG *fiskaz Goth fisks Oicel fiscr OE fiscThe First or Proto-Germanic Consonant Shift (Grimms Law) parity with other languages within the IE family reveals regular correspondences between Germanic and non-Germanic consonants. It looks as if the Germanic consonants shifted as compared with their non-Germanic counterparts. This phenomenon was first observed and later formulated in terms of phonetic law (1822) by (Rasmus Rask and Jacob Grimm. Hence its name- Grimms Law. By Grimms Law, which includes 3 acts, voiceless plosives (stops) developed in PG into voiceless fricatives (1 act) voiced aspirated plosives were shifted to pure voiced plosives or voiced fricatives and voiced plosives changed into voiceless plosives (stops).The danish scholar Karl Verner was the first to explain them as the result of further development of Germanic languages. According to Verner, all the early PG voiceless fricatives f, , h which arose under Grimms Law, became voiced between vowels if the preceding vowel was unstressed otherwise they remained voiceless. The express of fricatives occurred in early PG at the time when the stress was not but fixed on the root-morpheme. f v- b seofon d O Icel. hundra hundert h g Goth. swaihro OE sweger s z r Lat. auris Goth. auso Icel. eyra (ear) The change of z into r is called rhotacism.As a result of voicing, there arose an interchange of consonants in the grammatical forms of the word, termed grammatical interchange. Part of theforms retained a voiceless fricative, while other forms acquired a voiced fricative. For example, heffen (Inf.) huob Pas t sg.) heave ceosan (choose) curon (Past pl.). Some modern English speech communication retained traces of Verners Law death dead was- were, raise rear. passim history, PG vowels displayed a strong tendency to change. The changes were of the following kinds soft and quantitative, dependent and independent.qualitative changes affect the quality of the sound, for example o a or p f quantitative changes are those which make long sounds short or short sounds long. For example, i i dependent changes are restricted to certain positions when a sound may change under the influence of the neighbouring sounds or in a certain type of a syllable independent changes or regular (spontaneous) take place irrespective of phonetic conditions, that is they may affect a certain sound in all positions. In accented syllables the oppositions between vowels were carefully maintained and the number of stressed vowels grew. In unaccented positions the original contrasts between vowels were weakened o r lost the distinction of short and long vowels in unstressed syllables had been shortened.As for originally short vowels, they tended to be reduced to a neutral sound, losing their qualitative distinctions and were often dropped in unstressed final syllables (fiskaz). Strict differentiation of long and short vowels is regarded as an important characteristic of the Germanic group. Long vowels tended to become closer and to diphthongize, short vowels often changed into more open vowels. IE short o changed in Germanic into more open vowel a and thus ceased to be distinguished from the original IE a in other words in PG they merged into o. IE long a was narrowed to o and merged with o. For example, Lat. nox Goth. nahts Lat. mater OE modor Sans. bhrata OE broor .